[COMM-ORG] query: are more students interested in community organizing?
Discussion list for COMM-ORG
colist at comm-org.wisc.edu
Sun Apr 12 09:18:50 CDT 2009
[ed: thanks to Marybeth and Richard for their responses and Peter for
the followup
From: Marybeth McNamara <marybethmcnamara at gmail.com>
Mr. Dreier,
I'm not sure if the Times is focusing on ONLY undergrads, but I am a
graduate student at the UConn School of Social Work and my concentration
is Community Organizing.
The University offers MSW students 5 concentrations for students to
choose from -Casework, Groupwork, Policy Practice, Adminstration and
Community Organization.
The Community Organization concentration has the highest number of
students out of the 5 options.
I am not sure if this is always as it has been or a new phenomenon.
Maybe someone on the faculty/staff there could shed light on this topic?
Thanks,
Marybeth McNamara
****************************
From: Richard Wood <rlwood at unm.edu>
Great piece posted here by Peter Dreier. After years of studying and
writing about community organizing, I am finally teaching a full course
for undergrads on that topic, subtitled "theory and practice". I
certainly detect a new tone and tenor among my remarkably diverse
students (diverse ethnically/racially, socio-economically, politically,
and religiously) at a public university in a poor state, which Peter
captures well here.
For that course, would value seeing syllabi from similar courses others
have taught (and related materials: readings, assignments, practicums,
etc.).
Rich Wood, University of New Mexico, author of _Faith in Action:
Religion, Race, and Democratic Organizing in America (University of
Chicago Press, 2002)
*****************************
From:
"Peter Dreier" <dreier at oxy.edu>
Date:
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:46:26 -0700
To:
"Peter Dreier" <dreier at oxy.edu>
Friends and Colleagues:
I usually have about 20 students in the Community Organizing course I
teach each year at Occidental College. So far, 42 students have
registered for next fall's class. I haven't all of a sudden become a
more popular professor. There's clearly something happening on American
campuses and in the broader culture that's tapping the pent up idealism
of today's students. An important element of that new mood on campus is
Barack Obama, but this phenomenon is bigger than one person. That's the
subject of my latest blog, "A New Wave of Organizers for the Obama Era,"
for the Talking Points Memo (TPM) Cafe, linked here:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/peter_dreier/2009/04/a-new-wave-of-community-organi.php.
(I've also pasted the essay below)
That's also what reporter Sara Rimer learned when she interviewed
college students (including some of mine) and some professors
(including me) for her article in this Sunday's New York Times,
"Community Organizing Never Looked So Good."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/fashion/12organizer.html?ref=style
A New Wave of Community Organizers for the Obama Era
April 10, 2009, 10:40PM
I usually have about 20 students in the Community Organizing course I
teach each year at Occidental College in Los Angeles. So far, 42
students have registered for next fall's class.
I haven't all of a sudden become a more popular professor. There's
clearly something happening on American campuses and in the broader
culture that's tapping the pent up idealism of today's students. An
important element of that new mood on campus is Barack Obama.
More and more college students want careers where they can help make
society more humane, fair, and environmentally sustainable. They want to
put their skills, their idealism, and their energy to work promoting
social justice. My colleagues around the country tell me that the same
thing is happening on their campuses. A growing number of students who
are asking faculty and staff about internships, summer jobs, and careers
working with non-profit, advocacy, and grassroots organizing groups. Why
wait on tables when you could be changing the world?
That's what reporter Sara Rimer learned when she interviewed college
students (including some of mine) for her article in this Sunday's New
York Times, "Community Organizing Never Looked So Good."
Given that title, and the fact that appears in the Fashion & Style
section, you might think that Rimer asked students what they were
wearing to the next protest demonstration. But, in fact, hers is a
serious piece of reporting about what today's student activists want to
do when they graduate. Many of them want to become community organizers,
inspired by our new president.
Fortunately, there are many more opportunities today to work for social
change than there were when I was in college in the 1960s or even when
Obama was in college (at Occidental and Columbia) in the 1980s. The
number of nonprofit organizations engaged in the struggle for justice -
community groups, unions, environmental and consumer groups, public
health and food justice groups, civil rights organizations, women's and
gay rights groups, fair trade and anti-sweatshop groups, groups
advocating for children, for the disabled, for the elderly, and for
immigrants -- has mushroomed dramatically. In addition to the thousands
of issue-oriented advocacy groups, there are many publications, think
tanks, and, of course, websites that promote progressive causes, most of
which didn't exist even 20 years ago.
As Rimer discovered, community organizing groups and networks like
ACORN, PICO, DART, the Center for Community Change, the Industrial Areas
Foundation, National People's Action, U.S. Action, Gamaliel Foundation
(whose Chicago affiliate hired Obama after college) and others are
getting more applicants from college students and recent graduates. Many
of them already have some organizing experience through college
internships, summer jobs, or volunteering for a political campaign like
Obama's presidential crusade.
Perhaps because so many of them get practical experience while still in
college, working with off-campus groups, today's student activists are
much more pragmatic, savvy, and patient than their counterparts in the
1960s. They are skeptical but not cynical. They are not paralyzed by old
ideological battles or identity politics. They respect differences of
opinion, including religious beliefs, as well as the right to dissent.
They understand that they can disagree with their government and still
love their country and its ideals. They want major changes in our
institutions and policies, but they know that people need to win
stepping-stone reforms before they can envision a different kind of world.
For sure, student interest in political activism and community
organizing was going on long before the Obama campaign. In the 1990s,
students mobilized against sweatshops and for "fair trade" consumer
products, in support of "living wages" for university employees, and
around global warming and "greening" America's college campuses. The
AFL-CIO began the Organizing Institute, a summer internship program for
college students who wanted to learn about being a union organizer.
After years of watching the conservative movement spend millions of
dollars to recruit and training activists on campuses, liberal groups
like the Center for American Progress, Wellstone Action, Democracy
Matters, the Student Environmental Action Coalition and others began to
focus more attention on college students. Over the past decade, a
growing number of colleges and universities embraced the idea of
"service learning," linking classrooms and the community.
But there is no doubt that Obama's campaign and his victory, lit a
spark, accelerating student interest in politics in general and
grassroots organizing in particular. Millions of young people, including
college students and recent graduates, got involved in the Obama
campaign. Thousands learned organizing skills at Camp Obama training
sessions. The efforts of young people - as well as the youth vote - made
a big difference in his triumph last November. Many of the students who
volunteered in the campaign got a taste of organizing and now want to
pursue it as a career.
In many ways, Obama has given community organizing a new cache. He has
described the three years he spent after college as a community
organizer in Chicago after college as "the best education I ever had."
Obama has provided enormous visibility and credibility to organizing as
a career and profession. Obama's campaign stump speeches typically
included references to America's organizing tradition. "Nothing in this
country worthwhile has ever happened except when somebody somewhere was
willing to hope," Obama explained. "That is how workers won the right to
organize against violence and intimidation. That's how women won the
right to vote. That's how young people traveled south to march and to
sit in and to be beaten, and some went to jail and some died for
freedom's cause." Change comes about, Obama said, by "imagining, and
then fighting for, and then working for, what did not seem possible
before." His campaign slogan - "Yes, We Can" - was borrowed from Cesar
Chavez and the United Farmworkers movement
Credit must go, too, to Sarah Palin, who attacked Obama's community
organizing experience during her Republican National Convention speech
in St. Paul last August, and then, along with John McCain, went on the
warpath against ACORN, one of the nation's largest and most effective
community organizing groups. The GOP assault triggered a huge backlash
not only among community organizers all over the country (who were happy
for the free publicity) but also among newspaper columnists, editorial
writers, readers who wrote letters to the editor, and bloggers. In the
aftermath of that attack, more newspapers and magazines wrote stories
about community organizing describing and praising the activists who
improve communities by bringing people together and giving people the
confidence and leadership skills to promote change - than had been
written in the previous decade.
Despite our serious economic crisis, the country's mood has changed for
the better. Americans are worried about their jobs and their families,
but they still give the new president high marks for moving quickly to
address our problems. This is important, because significant
improvements only occur when people believe that things should be
changed and that they can be changed. Obama has restored a sense of
possibility and hope to American politics.
Even so, if Obama has any chance to be a transformational President, it
will require a powerful progressive movement that aligns itself with,
but isn't controlled by, the young president and progressive forces in
Congress. There is plenty of evidence that Americans want a more
activist government to address the problems of economic insecurity,
health care, the environment, and U.S. military intervention in Iraq and
elsewhere. To win universal health care, labor law reform, or
legislation to reduce global warming - and to stimulate the troubled
economy to promote shared prosperity and green jobs, and rescue people
from foreclosures -- Obama will confront fierce resistance from powerful
forces in the business community and their friends in Congress.
The Millennial generation - Americans now under 30 - voted
overwhelmingly for Obama. They are also ready to follow Obama's lead
and join the growing ranks of progressive activists.
They also know, however, that grassroots organizing is only one way to
bring about change. Increasingly, for example, students who go to law
school want to use their legal talents to right wrongs rather than
represent banks, corporations, and developers. Fortunately, there are a
growing number of public interest law firms around the country that link
lawyers to social movements concerned about the environment, housing,
consumer protection, immigrant rights, and other issues.
Likewise, students interested in medicine and health care can take many
paths to help change our failing health care system. A growing number of
students pursuing careers in public health, where they can combine their
concerns about the environment, medicine, social justice, and creating
livable communities. Or they can go to medical, nursing, or nutrition
school and use their skills by working in community clinics that serve
low-income people and agitate for change with such groups as Physicians
for a National Health Program and Physicians for Social Responsibility.
Whatever profession they pursue - architect, city planner, teacher,
biologist, engineer, nutritionist, accountant, aide to an elected
official, child care provider, lawyer, or physician, among them - they
can use their talents to help move society in a more progressive
direction or to protect and defend the status quo. They understand that
it isn't simply a matter of having skills. It's a question of what
values those skills will be used to promote -- and what kinds of
organizations they work for.
Obama has already helped change the nation's mood - and helped to
inspire a new generation of organizers and activists. More and more
young people want to pursue a career with a conscience.
But will the nonprofit groups that help advocate and organize for change
have the resources to employ them? Many environmental, community, and
other groups that do this work are facing difficult times, since they
depend on members' dues, foundation grants, bake sales and other
fundraisers to keep their organizations afloat. And will today's young
people be able to pursue their ideals if they can't afford to stay in
college, or if they are saddled with college loans that they can't
afford to pay back on an activist's salary?
Here's another way that Obama, and Congress, can help. They have already
expanded the federal budget for AmeriCorps, the nation's major community
service program. But what's needed is a major commitment to providing
students in two- and four-year colleges with financial assistance -
allowing them graduate debt-free -- if they pursue careers in the many
forms of public and community service. This means encouraging doctors
and nurses to work in clinics serving the poor, architects and planners
who work for nonprofit groups building mixed-income housing, engineers
and technicians who help design and install "green" technologies in our
homes and workplaces, and community organizers who help people help
themselves, through their faith-based institutions, neighborhoods, and
schools, in the great American tradition of voluntarism.
A character in George Bernard Shaw's play, Back to Methusaleh, says,
"You see things and you say, 'why?' But I dream things that never were,
and I say, "why not?'"
That's the essence of an activist -- someone who doesn't just criticize
awful conditions, but tries to change them, not on his or her own, but
with others. We endured eight years of White House contempt for the
practical idealism that makes change possible. Obama has restored
Americans' faith in themselves. You can find that new mood on almost
every college campus today. When a skeptic asks me if the students in
my communityorganizing class have what it takes to change the world, I'm
proud to say: Yes, They Can.
Peter Dreier is professor of politics and chair of the Urban &
Environmental Policy program at Occidental College.
_____________________________________
Peter Dreier
Dr. E.P. Clapp Distinguished Professor of Politics
Chair, Urban & Environmental Policy Program
Occidental College
1600 Campus Road
Los Angeles, CA 90041
Phone: (323) 259-2913
FAX: (323) 259-2734
Website: http://employees.oxy.edu/dreier
"The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of great
moral crises maintain their neutrality" - Dante
On 4/6/2009 10:03 AM, Discussion list for COMM-ORG wrote:
> --------
> This is a COMM-ORG 'colist' message.
> All replies to this message come to COMM-ORG only.
> --------
>
> [ed: please feel welcomed to copy COMM-ORG with replies to Peter's query.]
>
> From: "Peter Dreier" <dreier at oxy.edu>
>
>
> Colleagues:
>
>
>
> I have a question for those of you who teach undergraduate courses in
> Community Organizing: Is interest in your classes – or in community
> organizing more generally – increasing among students on your campuses?
> I hope you will respond quickly to this question. Here’s why:
>
>
>
> A New York Times reporter is writing a story about this phenomenon. Her
> thesis -- which I agree with (and even wrote a few articles about last
> year (http://dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=1215;
> http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080929/dreier) -- is that the Obama
> campaign, and his presidency, has not only heightened awareness of
> community organizing as a job/career/vocation, but accelerated the trend
> of student activists looking for work as organizers upon graduation.
> This was happening BEFORE the Obama campaign (ie the campus
> anti-sweatshop and campus living wage movements began in the late
> 1990s), but I think his campaign (which put heavy emphasis on recruiting
> young people and training volunteers as organizers,) accelerated it.
> Plus, any progressive movement requires a sense of hope and possibility,
> and I think Obama’s campaign and election provided some of that. Groups
> like Wellstone Action, Campus Progress (an offshoot of the Center for
> American Progress), United Students Against Sweatshops, the AFL-CIO’s
> Organizing Institute, and other groups that recruited and trained
> students also contributed to this.
>
>
>
> I teach a Community Organizing course every fall, which includes an
> internship with a community organizing group, a labor union, an
> environmental group, or another group that does organizing work. I
> usually have 20-25 students. Already, 42 students have registered for my
> course for next fall. I don’t think this is because I’ve all-of-a-sudden
> become a more popular professor. I think it has to do with the political
> climate, Obama, the growing visibility of organizing (not only because
> of Obama, but also because of the Palin/McCain attacks on organizers
> that triggered a huge backlash).
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-dreier/palin-attacks-on-communit_b_129568.html
>
>
>
> My friends who work for unions, ACORN, PICO, IAF, and other organizing
> groups tell me that they are getting more and more applicants for jobs
> and internships. I think this is all part of the same phenomenon.
>
>
>
> Are you seeing the same trend on your campus? Please let us all know. I
> can relay that to the NY Times reporter, who is doing the story for next
> week, so please respond ASAP.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Peter
>
> ____________________
>
> Peter Dreier
>
> E.P. Clapp Distinguished Professor of Politics
>
> Director, Urban & Environmental Policy Program
>
> Occidental College
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90041
>
> Phone: (323) 259-2913
>
> Email: dreier at oxy.edu
>
> Website: http://employees.oxy.edu/dreier
>
>
>
> "The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of great
> moral crises maintain their neutrality" - Dante
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Colist maillist - send messages to Colist at comm-org.wisc.edu
>
> To change your subscription, go to http://comm-org.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/colist
>
> All messages are archived at http://comm-org.wisc.edu/pipermail/colist/
>
> Please contact original message authors to request permission to forward messages.
>
>
More information about the Colist
mailing list