call for proposals: movement building in Appalachia
Discussion list for COMM-ORG
colist at comm-org.wisc.edu
Sun Apr 13 12:16:28 CDT 2008
From: "Stephen Fisher" <slfisher44 at embarqmail.com>
*Call for Proposals*
We are soliciting proposals for essays to be included in a book we are
editing on the role of movement-building, networking and
coalition-building as elements of citizen resistance in Appalachia.
We see this book as building in part upon the lessons learned from the
essays in Fisher’s /Fighting Back in Appalachia: Traditions of
Resistance and Change /(Temple, 1993). Many of these essays illustrate
the limits of single-issue localized work and describe the success of
multi-issue, membership-driven organizations that are able to link
issues to state, national and global patterns and concerns. The book’s
essays demonstrate the need for a critical discourse and practice that
can strengthen and link existing regional institutions while creating
new ones and building coalitions both within and outside the region.
We all should take heart from the impressive number of new books,
articles, and dissertations written about resistance efforts in the
region, and applaud and celebrate the valuable social change work that
has occurred over the past few decades. But during this same period
corporate-driven globalization has proceeded apace, and neoliberalism
has triumphed as a political philosophy and practice across many
nations. In the region, we have not been particularly successful in
laying the groundwork for a more meaningful and enduring movement or
network. Indeed, the Southern Empowerment Project and the Commission on
Religion in Appalachia, two of our more important regional
organizations, have recently shut their doors. Nor have we figured out
how to effectively and consistently link our change efforts to similar
struggles occurring nationally or globally. As one observer remarks, we
remain more isolated from other poor and working-class populations than
from the corporate and political forces that oppress us daily. This is
especially troublesome given that the levers of power available to us
locally are not sufficient to solve the problems we face.
This is not to say that there haven’t been admirable efforts in the past
at networking or that there isn’t important coalition work underway
today in the Appalachian region. We believe there is much to be learned
from these past and current struggles and that a book of essays
describing and drawing lessons from some of these efforts would be of
interest to both an Appalachian and a broader national academic and
activist audience.
This letter is designed to test the waters, and, of course, the focus
and direction of the book will be influenced in part by the nature of
the proposals we receive. But we are especially interested in essays
that realistically assess the successes and failures of
movement-building efforts in Appalachia and specifically address one or
more of the following questions and issues in terms of the organizing
effort(s) you are analyzing:
(1) What are the most important bases of unity among the people
involved? What is the role of identity as a basis of unity? Is this a
social identity—e.g., as women, persons of color, workers, etc.? What,
if any, is the role of placed-based identity in this organizing? Is the
notion of an Appalachian identity important in this effort? Why or why not?
(2) How do those involved define what they are organizing to combat?
Corrupt practices, globalization, capitalism, elite domination,
environmental destruction, etc.? What alternatives, if any, are being
offered?
(3) What strengths and weaknesses in the involved constituencies are
organizers trying to build on or confront, and how are they doing so?
(4) At what level or scale—local, state, regional, etc.—is the
organizing effort seeking to intervene to effect social change? What are
the limitations and advantages of organizing at this scale?
(5) Who are seen as natural allies of this movement-building effort?
What is being done to reach out to those allies and what obstacles
hinder this outreach?
(6) How is the organizing effort framing the goals it is pursuing? How,
if at all, is it purposely seeking to counter corporate and right-wing
ideological power in the framing of its key issues?
(7) How important is it for the organizing effort to create new
institutions (e.g., cooperatives, land trusts, fair trade, local
exchange systems….) in which people can act in new ways? How does it see
the relative effectiveness of new institutional spaces vs. political
education and persuasion as vehicles for social change?
(8) What specific lessons can be learned about movement-building in
Appalachia from the experiences of the organizing effort being examined?
As mentioned above, we are interested in receiving analyses of not only
current movement-building efforts but also past successes and failures.
We encourage collaborative writing by academics, organizers, and
activists. We are looking for articles written in a language and style
that are accessible to as broad and varied an audience as possible.
If interested, please submit to us by June 30 a description (1-2) pages
of what you propose to do. We envision the following timetable:
June 30: Deadline for proposals (please send an email copy to each of us)
September 1: Selection of proposals; tentative book outline
February 15, 2009: Submission of a first draft
Please pass this information on to others who might be interested in
contributing an essay to this book. If you have questions or suggestions
or have trouble making the June 30 deadline, do not hesitate to write or
call.
Steve Fisher Barbara Ellen Smith, Director
PO Box BBB Women Studies Program (0227)
Emory, VA 24327 Virginia Tech
276/944-3697 Blacksburg, VA 24061
slfisher44 at embarqmail.com <mailto:slfisher44 at embarqmail.com> 540/231-7322
smithbe at vt.edu <mailto:smithbe at vt.edu>
More information about the Colist
mailing list